Censorship In The Movie Con Air Source Bing.com
The movie Con Air, directed by Simon West and released in 1997, was a box office success. It was a crime-action movie with Nicolas Cage in the lead role. It was about a group of dangerous convicts who hijack a prison transport plane, and the efforts of a U.S. Marshal to stop them.
The movie was censored in some countries, particularly in the United States. The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) gave it a PG-13 rating, which means that some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.
The movie was censored for violence and language. Some of the violence was too graphic, and there were some scenes of drug use. The language was strong and profane in some scenes.
The censors also felt that the movie was too glamorizing of crime and violence. They felt that it portrayed criminals in a positive light and could be seen as an encouragement to criminal activities.
The censors also felt that the movie was too graphic in its depiction of violence. There were some scenes of torture, and some of the dialogue was deemed too strong for a PG-13 rating.
The censors also felt that the movie was too dark and disturbing for a PG-13 rating. There were some scenes of death and destruction, as well as some scenes of graphic violence.
The censorship of Con Air was seen as controversial by some. The movie was seen as a classic example of Hollywood’s double standard when it comes to violence in movies. Some argued that the movie was no more violent than other PG-13 rated movies, and that the censorship was unjustified.
Others argued that the censorship was necessary, as the movie could have had a negative effect on young viewers. The movie could have been seen as an endorsement of criminal activities and could have encouraged young people to act out in a similar way.
Conclusion
The movie Con Air was censored in some countries, particularly in the United States. The censors felt that the movie was too graphic in its depiction of violence and language, and that it glamorized crime and violence. While some argued that the censorship was unjustified, others argued that it was necessary to protect young viewers from the negative influence of the movie.
